Waiting for (Don Carlos) Godot: a tragicomedy in two acts 4 comments


Of the myriad blunders that needed to be excused or covered up concerning the Battle of Shiloh, one of the most notorious was Ulysses S. Grant’s absence from his army. Maintaining headquarters from approximately March 17th to the start of the battle on April 6th in a mansion at Savannah, Tennessee—ten miles downriver and on the opposite bank from his army at Pittsburg Landing—General Grant took a steamboat up to the landing most days, but returned at night.

There was absolutely no reason for Grant to have remained at William Cherry’s Savannah residence for more than two weeks, once his divisions had all departed for Pittsburg Landing (Lew Wallace’s division was already camped at and around Crump’s Landing, roughly midway in between). Grant had even mandated that “encampments will conform as near as possible to Army Regulations,” but then flouted these regulations himself, as they called for generals to reside in the center of the camp on the line of communication.

Halleck sent a message on March 20th, scout Carson returned on the 25th, and Buell’s letter arrived by the 26th, all with news that the Army of the Ohio lingered behind Duck River at Columbia, some eighty miles away, where it slowly replaced a burned bridge. This totally undercut Grant’s rationalization for remaining at Savannah in order to meet Buell. He could have camped with his army and traveled downriver to meet Buell at any time or just let Buell steam up to Pittsburg upon arrival. Making his Savannah headquarters even more superfluous, Grant sent his only scouts up the road to meet Buell and was constructing a telegraph line that extended in the same direction. Either of these methods should have given Grant sufficient advance warning of Buell’s approach to set up a meeting. Topping off General Grant’s misdeeds in this matter, when Buell informed Grant that he would be in Savannah on April 5th, Grant replied that he couldn’t meet with Buell until the next day.

Making matters even worse, the promotion of John A. McClernand and Charles F. Smith to major-general in the volunteer army—and both thus ranked brigadier-general William T. Sherman—forced Grant to react. McClernand’s name was higher on the list and, besides, Smith was incapacitated after barking his shin, which had become infected. Not wanting McClernand to take command of the camp, Grant kept Sherman in de facto charge through the ruse of pretending to move his own headquarters to Pittsburg Landing. He didn’t. When the surprise attack hit the almost completely unprepared Union army, there was no designated federal commander to make decisions for the five divisions.

The second act of this tragicomedy has Grant’s defenders leaping into the breach to cover up this incident. Usually, they merely comment on how Grant was waiting for Buell to arrive, without bothering to mention the utter ridiculousness of Grant’s claim.

A few writers indicate that the supposed necessity of remaining at Savannah was also due to boats from downstream, with regiments on board needing orders. But any boats arriving while Grant was visiting Pittsburg Landing would have been forced to lay idly by until his return. And all boats would have had to endure an otherwise avoidable delay, because their final destination—once Savannah’s garrison of three regiments had landed—was further upriver.

There is no telling how many Union soldiers might have been saved from death, wounding, or capture, if Grant had been with his army the entire time. This is especially so for the period from 5:00 A.M. on April 6th, when Colonel Everett Peabody’s patrol located the advancing enemy and prevented a total surprise, and 9:00 A.M., when Grant finally arrived on the battlefield to provide some semblance of coordination.

Share this:


4 thoughts on “Waiting for (Don Carlos) Godot: a tragicomedy in two acts

  • Melvin Cunningham

    Grant worked better when planned ahead and worked things out in his mind.

    • Joseph Rose Post author

      I have concluded that Grant was in one of his indolent periods leading up to the battle. The other possibility, that Grant was actively engaged at this time, would make him seem far worse. He made almost every mistake in the book, with his almost complete lack of preparations.

  • Phil Leigh

    It appears that Grant stayed at the Cherry Mansion as a matter of personal comfort. Is that correct?

    On another matter: Do you believe the Federal army should have been encamped on the right bank of the Tennessee River where it would be invulnerable to attack from Johnston? Was the land too low over there, or was there another reason to avoid the right bank, for campsites?

    • Joseph Rose Post author

      Apart from Grant’s personal comfort, I can’t think of any other logical reason for him to have stayed at the Cherry Mansion for this whole period. Even when enemy activity was picking up around Shiloh church, he showed no interest in being on site. Two days before the surprise attack, he was already back in Savannah for the evening when Sherman’s pickets were attacked. He went up to Pittsburg Landing, but everything was quiet by the time he arrived. He then hurt his leg when his horse fell descending the bluff back at the Landing. One would think, in these circumstances, he would have changed his mind and decided to remain with his army.

      The Federal army could have encamped safely on the left bank of the Tennessee River at and around Pittsburg Landing, where it would have been relatively invulnerable to attack if it had entrenched, with emplaced artillery, with cleared fields of fire, with the experienced divisions up front, with a connected line without gaps, with nearby reserves, and with good intelligence from pickets, vedettes, patrols, scouts, and spies. The land on the eastern bank was too low until the area around Savannah. Apart from the greater logistical difficulties in advancing on Corinth from there. I don’t see other reasons to have avoided the right bank for camping.

Comments are closed.